preloader
  • Home
  • Kubernetes Resource Calculator for Cluster Sizing and Requests

Use this interactive calculator to determine the optimal size of virtual machines for your Kubernetes cluster based on your deployment requests and limits

blog-thumb

๐Ÿ“– Estimated reading time: 6 min


Kubernetes Cluster Request Calculator

One of the most common challenges when setting up Kubernetes clusters is correctly sizing the necessary resources for the nodes that make up the cluster. How many vCPUs and how much RAM do you really need for your workloads? If you request too many resources, you’re wasting money; if you request too few, you’ll face performance issues or even failures.

These requests directly impact the Kubernetes scheduler and influence node sizing, whether they’re local virtual machines or cloud instances.

To help with this sizing process, I’ve developed an interactive calculator that you can use to accurately estimate CPU and memory requirements based on your planned deployments.

Kubernetes Resource Calculator

Basic
Advanced

Results:

Total CPU Required: 0 cores
Total Memory Required: 0 Mi
Recommended VM: -
View Detailed Calculations

To better understand how these parameters affect actual resource consumption and infrastructure planning, we’ve developed an interactive request calculator. It helps estimate how many resources a cluster needs, based on your deployment definitions, making it easier to project workload and choose the optimal size for your compute instances.


Why is it important to calculate resources accurately?

Kubernetes is a powerful platform for container orchestration that uses two fundamental concepts to manage computing resources:

โ’ˆ Requests: The minimum amount of resources that Kubernetes guarantees for a pod
โ’‰ Limits: The maximum value of resources that a pod can consume

When a pod is created, the Kubernetes scheduler looks for a node that has enough available resources to satisfy the pod’s requests. If the nodes in your cluster don’t have enough resources, the pods will remain pending.


The cost of undersizing

An undersized cluster can cause:

โˆ’ Pods in pending state
โˆ’ Degraded application performance
โˆ’ Frequent pod evictions
โˆ’ Container restarts due to OOMKilled (Out of Memory Killed)


The cost of oversizing

An oversized cluster can lead to:

โˆ’ Significant waste of resources
โˆ’ Unnecessary infrastructure costs
โˆ’ Low resource utilization efficiency
โˆ’ Reduced ROI on your Kubernetes investments


How to use the calculator

The calculator offers two operation modes:


Basic Mode

The basic mode is perfect for quick calculations and includes:

โˆ’ Total number of pods
โˆ’ CPU request per pod
โˆ’ Memory request per pod

With just these three values, you get an initial estimate of the resources needed for your VM.


Advanced Mode

For more precise sizing, the advanced mode allows you to specify:

โˆ’ CPU and memory (both requests and limits)
โˆ’ Additional buffer for growth
โˆ’ Node type (standard or high availability)
โˆ’ Custom utilization factor


How to interpret the results

The calculator provides three main metrics:

โ’ˆ Total CPU Required: Sum of CPU requests multiplied by the number of pods, with adjustments for system utilization
โ’‰ Total Memory Required: Sum of memory requests, converted into appropriate units (Mi/Gi)
โ’Š Recommended VM: Suggested virtual machine size that would accommodate your workloads

Additionally, you can see detailed calculations by clicking on “View detailed calculations,” which shows exactly how the numbers were derived.


Factors considered by the calculator


The calculator assumes that you shouldn’t plan to use 100% of the available resources on a VM. This is because:

โˆ’ Kubernetes itself consumes resources
โˆ’ The operating system and base services need resources
โˆ’ Reserving margin is crucial for unexpected load spikes

By default, the calculator uses a utilization limit of 80% for standard nodes and 70% for high-availability nodes.


Additional buffer

In advanced mode, you can define an additional buffer to accommodate:

โˆ’ Future workload growth
โˆ’ Unexpected variations in resource usage
โˆ’ Horizontal Pod Autoscaler (HPA) requirements

A 20% buffer is a conservative choice for most environments.


Best practices for defining requests and limits


Defining requests

โˆ’ CPU: Start by measuring your application’s base usage and add a 20-30% buffer
โˆ’ Memory: Base it on average usage plus a 30-40% buffer (memory tends to vary more than CPU)


Defining limits

โˆ’ CPU: Typically 1.5x to 2x the request value
โˆ’ Memory: At most 1.5x the request value (to avoid OOMKilled)


Practical example

For a typical web application:

 
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: 0.5
    memory: 256Mi
  limits:
    cpu: 1.0
    memory: 384Mi
     

Special considerations for different workloads


Stateless applications

โˆ’ Can have a smaller buffer
โˆ’ Focus on request/limits ratio to maximize density


Stateful applications

โˆ’ Need larger buffer to avoid disruptions
โˆ’ Should consider I/O peak loads


Databases

โˆ’ Memory requirements typically more critical than CPU
โˆ’ Consider adding at least a 50% buffer for memory


Monitoring and adjustment

Remember that the calculated values are just a starting point. Once your cluster is running:

โ’ˆ Monitor actual resource usage
โ’‰ Compare with allocations
โ’Š Adjust requests and limits as needed
โ’‹ Recalculate the optimal node size


Why Pods Stay in Pending State When Scaling Up

When scaling deployments in Kubernetes (for example, increasing replicas to 50 pods) itโ€™s not uncommon to see several pods get stuck in the Pending state. This typically happens when the cluster does not have enough available resources to satisfy the requests defined in the pod spec.


Common scenario

Letโ€™s say each pod has a CPU request of 500m (half a vCPU):

 
resources:
  requests:
    cpu: 500m
     

If you try to deploy 50 pods with this configuration, the total requested CPU will be:

50 pods ร— 0.5 vCPU = 25 vCPUs

If your worker nodes each have only 8 vCPUs, and there are no other free nodes or autoscaling in place, the Kubernetes scheduler will not be able to place all pods. It will keep scheduling them only where resource requests can be satisfied. Once all nodes are full (or canโ€™t fit the requested CPU), the remaining pods stay in Pending.


Key reasons for this behavior:

โˆ’ Requests are guaranteed allocations: The scheduler will not place a pod unless it can fully guarantee the requests value.
โˆ’ Scheduler doesn’t overcommit requests: Even if real usage is low, the scheduler only looks at requested resources, not actual usage.
โˆ’ Node capacity is finite: If nodes are already hosting pods that use up most of their CPU or memory (based on requests), thereโ€™s no room left.


How to solve this

โˆ’ Properly size your nodes: Use tools like the request calculator to estimate total CPU and memory usage.
โˆ’ Add more nodes: Use a Cluster Autoscaler or manually scale your node pool or MachineSet.
โˆ’ Review and reduce CPU requests: Confirm if your application really needs 500m. Over-provisioning is common.
โˆ’ Use Vertical Pod Autoscaler: This tool can help adjust CPU/memory requests automatically based on usage.
โˆ’ Split the workload: Instead of deploying 50 replicas at once, consider progressive rollouts.


Pro tip

If you want to visualize why pods are pending, use:

 
kubectl describe pod <pod-name>
 

Look for the “Events” section. You’ll typically see messages like:

 
0/3 nodes are available: 3 Insufficient cpu.
 

This means that the scheduler couldnโ€™t find nodes with enough available CPU to meet the request.


Understanding this behavior is essential when scaling workloads and planning cluster capacity. The calculator provided in this article can help you anticipate such situations before they happen.


Conclusion

Properly sizing resources for Kubernetes clusters is a mixture of science and art. This calculator provides a solid starting point, but continuous monitoring and adjustments are essential to optimize the balance between performance and cost.

Try different scenarios, compare the results, and use this information to make more informed decisions about VM sizing for your next Kubernetes cluster.


Additional resources

โˆ’ Official Kubernetes documentation on resource management
โˆ’ Best practices for requests and limits
โˆ’ Vertical Pod Autoscaler - A complementary tool to automatically adjust requests



Share this post and keep following our site for more news about Kubernetes and open-source technologies!

Check out these other interesting articles! ๐Ÿ”ฅ



Support our work ๐Ÿ’–

Did you like what you found here? With each click on a banner, you help keep this site alive and free. Your support makes all the difference so we can continue bringing content you love. Thank you! ๐Ÿ˜Š


Articles you might like ๐Ÿ“Œ
comments powered by Disqus